phoenix landscape

WeLink, a service provider founded in 2018, has rolled out fixed wireless service offering symmetrical speeds up to a gigabit per second in metro Las Vegas and Phoenix. In an email to Telecompetitor, WeLink founder and CEO Kevin Ross said the company plans to be in a total of 10 major metros in the next 18 to 24 months.

The company will use 5G millimeter wave technology and 60 GHz wireless technology that it developed, according to Ross. The latter frequency will be used for backhaul and access, Ross said. He also noted that the access equipment uses a mesh approach. With a mesh approach, one customer’s equipment can act as a repeater for another customer, thereby extending range.

The company plans to charge $70 a month for gigabit service for 24 months or $80 a month without a time commitment, according to its web page.

WeLink will compete against Cox and Lumen/CenturyLink. Ross sees WeLink having an edge against Cox because although the cable company offers gigabit downstream speeds, its upload speeds top out at 30 Mbps, he said. And Lumen doesn’t offer fiber-to-the-premises everywhere. He also noted that customers may pay less with WeLink service in comparison with similar offerings from competitors.

A Growing Trend, But Not for Everywhere?

WeLink is the third company claiming gigabit speeds using fixed wireless technology that Telecompetitor has covered in just over a month. The other companies we covered are South Valley Internet, which offers symmetrical gigabit speeds in a semi-rural area south of Silicon Valley and Jade Communications, which offers speeds up to 2 Gbps in Manassa, Colorado.

Like WeLink, Jade Communications charges $80 a month for its gigabit service. South Valley Internet isn’t initially targeting residences because service is priced at $185 a month, but the company expects to have an offering that will be more competitively priced and suitable for residential customers when its vendor Adtran releases the next generation of the product.

These gigabit wireless deployments come at a time when the FCC has yet to determine the fate of several companies that were tentatively awarded funding in the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) auction to bring gigabit fixed wireless to rural areas lacking broadband service.

All the fixed wireless equipment claiming gigabit speeds that Telecompetitor has run across operates at very high frequencies. Those high frequencies support faster speeds but over relatively short distances, raising the question of whether the equipment is suitable for use in rural areas.

WeLink Home Antenna

One thing WeLink, Jade and South Valley Internet have in common is that they are all targeting areas that are somewhat densely populated. Jade uses Terragraph equipment originally developed by Facebook that uses a mesh approach. Nevertheless, customers must be within 500 to 1,000 feet of the access point or another customer/repeater for the service to work, a requirement that hasn’t been an issue in Jade’s service area, but which could be an issue in rural areas.

South Valley’s equipment also uses a mesh approach and the company is targeting a business district where it expects to have multiple customers.

Ross said WeLink has no plans to target rural areas.

Updated with additional information about the equipment WeLink is using.

Join the Conversation

3 thoughts on “WeLink is Latest Provider to Offer Gigabit Fixed Wireless – and It’s Symmetrical

  1. Wow there is SO much wrong with this story! First let’s talk about the push of symmetrical Internet. For those who have run ISP’s for decades it is well known, that at it’s peak, the users of the Internet use 1/5th upload to download. Why the push for 1000/1000? Because it’s another path for people to use grants to overbuild the existing Internet whom no one seems to like anymore, if you were in Government and VC’s. The only way people can take loyal customers away from their existing ISP’s is to tell them they are being ripped off, so the new companies say speeds should be equal up and down. Not now nor ever will it be needed, you should understand where this ridiculous push comes from. Bear in mind that 60GHZ is very flawed as evidence from a rain fall we had last night that took all 60Ghz radios down, Ultra-Wide is far worse than 60GHZ but Verizon/AT&T have conned billions out of the federal government to build a basically unusable network, plan on that with this company. As for their eagerness to use federal funding, RDOF is a train wreck, I’ve never had much faith in people who’s only business model is federal grants. With no personal sweat in the business it’s normally destined to failure, just like this company who puts off enough red flags already. The Internet was so much better before the government got itself involved in it, and the dying telecommunications companies desperately lobbied to inject themselves into the information (Broadband) industry. We’re two very different business models.

    1. Our government intended the internet. There was no better version of it beforehand. Privatization and consumerism created the problems described.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Don’t Miss Any of Our Content

What’s happening with broadband and why is it important? Find out by subscribing to Telecompetitor’s newsletter today.

You have Successfully Subscribed!