Small businesses in rural areas pay more for broadband connectivity on a per-bit basis than their counterparts in metropolitan areas, according to a new study from the Small Business Administration released this week.

The study, titled The Impact of Broadband Speed and Price on Small Business, found that metro area small businesses pay an average of $115 monthly for Internet service, which is higher than the average $93 that rural small businesses pay for service. But the metro area small businesses get disproportionately more bandwidth for the extra $22.

“Comparing the availability and price of services offered in select metro and rural regions indicates that rural customers pay significantly higher prices than metro customers for the same bandwidth, and that higher-bandwidth, higher-priced services are more readily available in the metro regions than in the rural regions,” the report states.

Advertisement

Almost half (48%) of rural respondents and more than one-third (37%) of metro respondents said they were not satisfied with their Internet speed. Nearly one-fourth of respondents said they need more than 10 Mb/s for business purposes, with nearly one half saying they desired that level of bandwidth. A bit less than 20% of respondents said they needed speeds of 50 Mb/s or higher, with an additional 10% saying they desired service at that level or higher.

In an announcement of the results, Winslow Sargeant , Chief Counsel for Advocacy for the SBA argued for increased competition as a means of expanding the availability and affordability of broadband in rural areas. “All small businesses must have access to fast and affordable broadband if they’re going to succeed in the global economy,” he said. “Today’s study shows that a lack of competition in broadband providers is having a negative impact on rural small businesses.”

The report authors made several policy recommendations based on their findings. Perhaps the most interesting of these is a recommendation to consider small business needs in Universal Service reform. The authors note, quite correctly, that “the focus of the Universal Service programs has been on institutions (through the e-rate program for schools and libraries and the rural health care pilot program for health care entities) and on residential service (through the high-cost and low income programs).”

But at least one report recommendation will get little support from incumbent service providers. The report authors recommend, for example, that policymakers encourage and enable small business broadband providers by providing access to network infrastructure or otherwise lowering barriers to entry.

Small telcos, in particular, are also likely to dispute the report’s recommendation to “stay the course on the implementation of the FCC’s National Broadband Plan.” That plan has drawn substantial criticism from rural telcos who argue that the plan, as outlined, would set the target national minimum broadband speed too low.

The full report is available here.

Join the Conversation

3 thoughts on “SBA Report: Rural Small Businesses Underserved by Broadband

  1. The unfortunate angle with reports like this is they put 'rural' in one bucket. When in reality, as it relates to broadband, there are two rural Americas – those that are served by tier 1 and 2 carriers like AT&T and Qwest and those that are served by IOCs. Rural territory served by IOCs offer much better access to broadband than those territories served by the likes of AT&T and Qwest, but this type of granular analysis doesn't make into these reports.

  2. Amen to that Bernie,
    Don't incude us with those tier 1 or 2 companies. I wear two hats. I am a Qwest customer who lives 2 miles from town with no DSL service……none…oh but they will sell me a T1 for $480 a month.

    My other hat is I manage a small coop telco covering 100 square miles and we have FTTH to 100% of our patrons. No speed issues here.

  3. This is exactly the problem with reports like this. Regulators and government officials see stuff like this and think all of rural is bad and want to fix the problem. They think all of rural America is broken so they want to have a universal fix, when its not a universal problem. They should be trying to replicate what's going on in tier 3 markets to tier 1 markets. But instead they think the whole system is broken and by trying to fix it, they're throwing out the baby with the bath water.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Don’t Miss Any of Our Content

What’s happening with broadband and why is it important? Find out by subscribing to Telecompetitor’s newsletter today.

You have Successfully Subscribed!