In comments filed with the FCC yesterday, four rural telco organizations urged the commission not to adopt certain Universal Service reforms proposed in a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) released late last year.

In an announcement issued yesterday, the rural telco groups argued that Universal Service reforms adopted thus far for rural carriers “have consisted entirely of caps, cuts and phase-outs to cost recovery components.”

The groups urged the FCC to focus on developing “sufficient, predictable and meaningful” Universal Service and inter-carrier compensation (ICC) mechanisms to support broadband services in areas served by rural carriers.

Filing the 345-page joint comments were the National Exchange Carrier Association, the National Telecommunications Cooperative Association, the Organization for the Promotion and Advancement of Small Telecommunications Companies and the Western Telecommunications Alliance. In the comments, the groups ask the FCC at a minimum to provide Universal Service support for “stand-alone broadband offerings, middle mile costs and conversions to IP-enabled switching.”

The references to broadband and middle mile costs are not surprising. Rural telcos have argued for years that Universal Service should help cover those costs. Today’s voice-focused Universal Service program already covers some IP switching costs—but as the program transitions to focus on broadband rather than voice, it’s not surprising that the rural groups want to confirm that policy will continue—especially now that the FCC has clearly indicated that it is eager to see service providers exchange voice traffic directly in IP format.

The organizations also argued that the FCC should:

  • Refrain from applying broadband-specific performance requirements and other “burdensome obligations” on rural carriers until it has determined specific broadband support mechanisms
  • Defer any changes to the interstate rate of return until Universal Service and ICC reforms are implemented
  • Avoid phasing out support in areas with unsubsidized competition or otherwise modifying service area boundaries until clear procedures are in place
  • Decline to use quantile regression methods to limit reimbursements of capital and operating expenses

“In these comments we call upon the FCC to eliminate lingering regulatory uncertainty, fulfill the core statutory objectives of universal service, provide a robust, sufficient and predictable Connect America Fund for consumers served by rural carriers, and ultimately allow those carriers to get back to the business of investing in networks and delivering affordable, high-quality services to consumers,” said NTCA CEO Shirley Bloomfield in the announcement.

The rural groups are not relying on their own persuasive powers in attempting to influence FCC actions on Universal Service reform, however. Last week, the NTCA, OPASTCO and the WTA sent a letter to Agriculture Secretary Jonathan Vilsack asking him to escalate rural telco concerns about proposed Universal Service reforms with the FCC.

Join the Conversation

3 thoughts on “Rural Groups Urge FCC to Look Beyond Cuts and Caps for USF Reform

  1. Given the success the Internet industry had with raising awareness around SOPA by shutting down their websites (wikipedia, reddit, etc) for 24 hours, I propose the rural telecom industry do the same. Shut down our networks for 24 hours to demonstrate the impact of all of these rural telcos going away, since it seems like that's the FCC's agenda.

    That will raise more awareness then any lobbying effort or press release.

  2. The Rural Telecommunications Group (RTG – which represents small, rural wireless providers also filed comments yesterday.

    “More than anything else, the Commission should make sure that in its quest to push rural 4G service with Phase II funding it does not inadvertently allow whatever level of mobile voice and data service is in rural markets today to deteriorate,” said Carri Bennet, RTG’s General Counsel. “Existing rural services should not be harmed in any way and rural consumers currently receiving service should be protected at all costs.”

    As part of its recommendations to the Commission, RTG encourages the FCC to adopt a rule that would prohibit carriers from blocking their customers from accessing the networks of other carriers when such access covers area unserved by the blocking carrier. A more open roaming environment will make rural carriers less dependent on Mobility Fund support and allow customers of nationwide carriers to access voice and data services in rural markets that they are currently prevented from accessing by some of the largest carriers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Don’t Miss Any of Our Content

What’s happening with broadband and why is it important? Find out by subscribing to Telecompetitor’s newsletter today.

You have Successfully Subscribed!