Broadband USA Enthusiasm for the federal government’s handling of the broadband stimulus plan so far is a little underwhelming, to say the least. Both the Department of Agriculture’s RUS program and the Department of Commerce’s NTIA are in need of some love, relative to the BTOP and BIP programs. Heck, even the government itself is being critical of the stimulus program to date. Congress’ Agriculture Committee has expressed skepticism of the developing broadband stimulus roadmap. Is all of this criticism due to the current popular trend of ‘piling on the government’ as wasteful, inefficient, and even incompetent? Or something else?

Take for example the reaction to NTIA’s recruitment of ‘volunteers’ to help evaluate stimulus grant applications. “Tell me how someone with expertise in innovative programs to increase the demand for broadband services understands why one broadband technology may be a better fit than another?” says Lynette Luna of FierceBroadbandWireless. Craig Settles of Successful.com tells Ars Technica, “This has to be THE most ridiculous and potentially most disastrous decision made by a federal agency with regard to distribution of taxpayer money.” Ouch.

Call me crazy, but I don’t get the same reaction. In fact, if done right, I think the ‘volunteer’ action could be a good move. My only caveat is the volunteers do indeed need to be qualified. Additionally, they should not have conflicts of interest or other ulterior motives. Assuming those conditions can be met, why not get input from expert ‘volunteers.’ It could provide a great diversity of opinion and input to this important process. I don’t believe these volunteers have the final say – they are just providing input for the final decision makers. What’s so crazy about that?

Advertisement

Certainly, some areas of the federal government have a well deserved reputation for inefficiency and waste, but they are not alone. Just look in today’s headlines to see great non-government examples of waste, inefficiency, and incompetency (and even outright fraud). General Motors, Merrill Lynch, Chrysler, Wells Fargo, Stanford Financial – shall I go on. The point being, few institutions are remotely close to perfect. Most institutions have flaws – just like most people. Those that don’t are the exception, not the rule. Government is no different. Should we as citizens hold the government to the highest standards? Absolutely. I’m all for that. But I do wonder if some of the criticism being leveled at them over the stimulus program is constructive.

This post is not intended to be a government love fest. I have no special place in my heart for the government. I have never worked for a government agency, and probably never will (although you should never say never). I have no business relationship with any form of government. I also believe they should take a hard look at the NOFA and revise it, due to some onerous conditions. But I also believe it’s real easy to take potshots at government – in fact, it’s seems like the ‘in’ thing to do. I’m not rooting for the government – I’m rooting for the stimulus program. Right now it’s in the government’s hands. I’m willing to give them a chance to get it right.

What do you think? Offer your thoughts through the comments tool below.

Join the Conversation

2 thoughts on “Little Love for Government on Broadband Stimulus Plan

  1. Though my initial reaction was a little over the top, in large part due to the initial shock of such an unanticipated decisions, I and others don't have a problem with volunteerism or peer review by itself. If NTIA had announced three months out that they planned to go this direction, and when they announced it had a clear plan of how this was volunteer program was going to run, this wouldn't be as bog of a concern, But in about 35 days NTIA is expecting a huge number of apps to process, and from what people at the Workshop where this was announced reported, NTIA couldn't even answer some basic questions about how this program would be run, how they would ensure there's no conflict of interest, etc.

    There doesn't appear to be sufficient thought put into how they will manage the mechanics of a process of making the first cut from proposals many of which will involve millions of dollars per proposal.

    The other disturbing thing for many of us is that, were the NTIA to – like RUS will – hire people to do this task, these would be the only jobs created this year by what is a jobs creation bill. There are tech companies that had to lay off people because the stimulus in effect froze many government projects while officials wait to see if they can win a grant. At least if these laid off workers were hired to review projects, assuming non conflicts of interest was properly managed, you'd be putting some people back to work.

    1. Craig – I can appreciate your concerns. A lot of them make sense. I don't envy NTIA and RUS. On the one hand, they have the fiduciary responsibility to distribute taxpayer money (although, aren't we really talking about taxpayer backed loans) correctly and avoid waste and fraud. On the other, they're under tremendous pressure to get things going quickly and efficiently. Under those conditions, I guess I give them a liitle more slack.

      It's real easy to 'Monday morning quarterback' this process. I hope we can all find ways to offer constructive feedback, and make the stimulus program a success for all involved.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Don’t Miss Any of Our Content

What’s happening with broadband and why is it important? Find out by subscribing to Telecompetitor’s newsletter today.

You have Successfully Subscribed!