Last week, I attended the Independent Show, which is the main tradeshow for smaller, independent and often rural cable providers. The show is jointly produced by the National Cable Television Cooperative  and the American Cable Association. It’s a great show, which really does give you the pulse of the independent cable industry.

A recurring theme that I often hear from IPTV providers, who typically are telcos, was also very present at this show with these cable companies. It refers to the business challenges behind offering video services. To be quite blunt, the recurring theme I hear is the “video business sucks.” That is, it’s a profit margin challenged business – to say the least.

Rightly or wrongly, much of the blame for these margin challenges is put upon the cost of programming – both cable network programming and local broadcast (in the form of retransmission fees). Both of these fee types are spiraling upward, with no end in sight.

Speaker after speaker at the Independent Show highlighted how these spiraling programming costs basically make video as a product, unprofitable. If not for broadband, voice in many cases, and business services in some cases, many independent cable companies would not survive, they argue. In fact many haven’t survived.

The cost of programming argument is the exact same argument I hear from telcos, who feel the need to offer video via IPTV for two reasons – 1) to remain competitive, often with cable providers, and 2) to generate enough ARPU to justify significant investment in their broadband networks.

This begs the question, if NCTC members see the cost of programming as a serious impediment to profitability, is there any hope for the video business? After all, by my math, NCTC members collectively are the second largest buyer of programming, behind only Comcast. If that amount of scale does not lower the cost of programming enough for its members, what, if anything will?

Perhaps video will be forever relegated to a classic loss leader. Use it as tool to upsell your more profitable services and hope it doesn’t drag you down in the process. Or will the system simply break (or be disrupted) – many argue it’s unsustainable – with a more reasonable and perhaps profitable model as a result. Let the debate continue!

Image courtesy of flickr user Diesel Demon.

SIMILAR STORIES

Telecompetitor Arches
Comcast’s Xfinity launches new video plans
Learn more about this post
Telecompetitor Arches
Home Telecom increases subscriber upgrades 5x with new residential experiences
Learn more about this post
Frustrated internet_ ser
57% of telcos have outages at least once per week: Report
Learn more about this post