The Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) has updated the interactive rural broadband CAF map originally made public in October. The map shows areas eligible for funding under the Connect America Fund (CAF) program, including those where broadband service already has been deployed.

USAC calls the updated CAF map “version 2.0.” The update reflects information for 2018 filed with USAC by network operators receiving broadband support.

The map is highly detailed and gives users the ability to click on a dot on the map to reveal the address of the location to which service has been deployed that is represented by that dot. Also included are the latitude and longitude of the location, the provider that deployed the service and the maximum speed available to the location.

The map also is color-coded to indicate areas that received different types of funding, including:

  • ACAM (alternative Connect America Fund model): for rate of return carriers that accepted model-based broadband funding
  • CAF-BLS (broadband loop support): for rate of return carriers that continue to receive high-cost Universal Service Fund (USF) dollars based on traditional methodology based on embedded costs
  • CAF II: model-based funding for price cap carriers
  • RBE (rural broadband experiments): for traditional and non-traditional network operators that won funding through a reverse auction
  • AK: for Alaskan network operators, who were funded through a plan tailored for the state’s unique population patterns


Users also can see summaries of locations served by state and by provider.

“The CAF Map is a key source of information about CAF-supported broadband deployment for consumers, policymakers, researchers and others,” wrote USAC in an email to entities on its e-mail distribution list.

The detailed information included in the updated CAF map stands in sharp contrast with information about broadband availability outside areas that were targeted for the various funding programs.

Numerous entities have expressed concern that when areas eligible for funding were initially determined, many areas that should have been eligible were not included. This occurred because policymakers considered an entire census block to be served even if only one location actually has broadband available to it. In some cases, a census block might have been disqualified simply because a provider said it could easily deploy service there, even though it had not yet done so.

The National Telecommunications and Information Administration and service provider association USTelecom both have projects underway to correct this problem. Legislators also may get involved, as the Senate last week held a hearing on the same issue.

Join the Conversation

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Don’t Miss Any of Our Content

What’s happening with broadband and why is it important? Find out by subscribing to Telecompetitor’s newsletter today.

You have Successfully Subscribed!