http://www.telecompetitor.com/verizon-launching-ip-powered-fios-digital-voice/ Providing insight, analysis, and commentary on the evolving telecom competitive landscape Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:59:55 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.telecompetitor.com/verizon-launching-ip-powered-fios-digital-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-4418 Anonymous Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:20:22 +0000 http://www.telecompetitor.com/verizon-launching-ip-powered-fios-digital-voice/#comment-4418 Or even Vonage and other services which cost less. Or even Vonage and other services which cost less.

]]> http://www.telecompetitor.com/verizon-launching-ip-powered-fios-digital-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-4104 Jimmy Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:31:51 +0000 http://www.telecompetitor.com/verizon-launching-ip-powered-fios-digital-voice/#comment-4104 you might be leaving money on the table if you do that. its always easier to lower pricing than to raise it. they need to see what the market is telling them first. you might be leaving money on the table if you do that. its always easier to lower pricing than to raise it. they need to see what the market is telling them first.

]]> http://www.telecompetitor.com/verizon-launching-ip-powered-fios-digital-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-4103 Warren Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:06:41 +0000 http://www.telecompetitor.com/verizon-launching-ip-powered-fios-digital-voice/#comment-4103 I wonder if Verizon and AT&T are missing the point with this strategy. I'm all for advanced features, but why price it the same as POTS? If the goal is to keep people from giving up landlines, why not price it more aggressively? Shouldn't IP voice be cheaper than POTS. If not, I'm not sure the new features are incentive enough to keep people from surrendering their landline for wireless. I wonder if Verizon and AT&T are missing the point with this strategy. I’m all for advanced features, but why price it the same as POTS? If the goal is to keep people from giving up landlines, why not price it more aggressively? Shouldn’t IP voice be cheaper than POTS. If not, I’m not sure the new features are incentive enough to keep people from surrendering their landline for wireless.

]]>