<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verizon: Cut Your Landline, You Don’t Need it Anymore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.telecompetitor.com/verizon-cut-your-landline-you-dont-need-it-anymore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.telecompetitor.com/verizon-cut-your-landline-you-dont-need-it-anymore/</link>
	<description>Providing insight, analysis, and commentary on the evolving telecom competitive landscape</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:12:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.telecompetitor.com/verizon-cut-your-landline-you-dont-need-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-7754</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telecompetitor.com.s71817.gridserver.com/?p=1462#comment-7754</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not surprising that it&#039;s Verizon rather than AT&amp;T, given that Verizon isn&#039;t wholly owned by a traditional phone company and AT&amp;T is.  AT&amp;T (Wireless) is really the only wireless company I wouldn&#039;t expect to see this from </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s not surprising that it&#039;s Verizon rather than AT&amp;T, given that Verizon isn&#039;t wholly owned by a traditional phone company and AT&amp;T is.  AT&amp;T (Wireless) is really the only wireless company I wouldn&#039;t expect to see this from</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim </title>
		<link>http://www.telecompetitor.com/verizon-cut-your-landline-you-dont-need-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-7753</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telecompetitor.com.s71817.gridserver.com/?p=1462#comment-7753</guid>
		<description>Hey if metroPCS can go after landline customers, why not VZW. Growth has to come from somewhere for these wireless companies. The only way they can continue to grow is to steal each others customers or take landline customers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey if metroPCS can go after landline customers, why not VZW. Growth has to come from somewhere for these wireless companies. The only way they can continue to grow is to steal each others customers or take landline customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
