Newsletter
Google Left Banner
WiMAX Expanding Broadband Competition in Rural America
06 Nov, 2008
Open Range Communications of Denver, Colorado recently received a $267 million broadband loan from the USDA’s RUS program for the build out of broadband in 500 rural communities. The loan proceeds were held up until the FCC acted on a request from Open Range’s spectrum partner, Globalstar. Globalstar asked the FCC to allow them to offer Ancillary Terrestrial Component (ATC) services over their existing spectrum holdings. The FCC granted that request, clearing the way for Globalstar and Open Range to offer WiMAX services in those identified rural communities. “We expect our partner [Open Range] to initially deploy infrastructure in more than 500 rural communities with the ability to expand the relationship over the next six years to additional markets covering 50 million people or about 15% of the U.S. population,'' said Jay Monroe, CEO and Chairman of Globalstar in a company statement.
WiMAX continues to empower a variety of telecompetitors in both urban and rural markets. The FCC’s recent approval of the Clearwire-Sprint XOHM venture opens the door to a true national WiMAX provider, with the capability to compete against both wireline and wireless broadband providers. Companies like DigitalBridge and Azulstar are doing the same in smaller and rural markets. Fairpoint also recently announced it intends to use WiMAX in some Northeastern rural markets. In its relatively short life, WiMAX is providing significant competitive fuel for the marketplace.
DigitalBridge Communications Announces Completion of $16.5 Million Capital Raise
27 Oct, 2008ASHBURN, Va., Oct. 27 /PRNewswire/ -- DigitalBridge Communications Corp., the largest private provider of WiMAX broadband services in the United States, today announced it has completed raising a total of $16.5 million of senior and subordinated debt along with additional capital from its existing equity investors. These funds provide the company with
significant additional liquidity with which to continue to build the enterprise. Read More ...
WiMAX Comes to Sioux Falls, SD
12 Aug, 2008
WiMAX service provider DigitalBridge Communications (DBC) announced the launch of their Bridgemaxx service in Sioux Falls, SD. Bridgemaxx is DBC’s brand for their WiMAX service, which initially starts out as a wireless DSL type product. DBC also intends to roll out mobile WiMAX services in their markets, already launching it in their Jackson Hole, Wyoming market. DBC has been quietly rolling out WiMAX services in rural markets across the U.S. They have other live markets in Montana, Idaho, Indiana, and Virginia.
WiMAX Roots Being Laid in Rural Markets
03 Jul, 2008
Like many technologies before it, including digital switching and IPTV, WiMAX technology’s roots are being laid in rural markets. The first WiMAX deployments are happening in towns like Madison, South Dakota and Rexburg, Idaho, and are being deployed by small independent operators not familiar to most, including DigitalBridge Communications and Sioux Valley Wireless. It’s not surprising. Many new technologies are vetted out in this manner, only to eventually gain mass market attention in large urban areas. IPTV is probably the most recent example. I remember listening to rural telcos like CC Communications of Fallon, Nevada and Chibardun Telephone of Cameron, Wisconsin talking about their pioneering video over VDSL deployments way back in 1997, almost a decade before AT&T began to get all of the attention. This scenario is repeating itself with WiMAX. The important early lessons about WiMAX and its capabilities/limitations will be played out in Madison, not in Washington DC or Baltimore.
These rural markets are also great laboratories for the competitive impact of WiMAX. DigitalBridge and Sioux Valley are deploying in some markets where either DSL and cable modem (or both) are present. It will be interesting to watch how consumers react to this new broadband option. Will the broadband portability and mobility that WiMAX provides trump wireline broadband, or simply augment it? Will consumers abandon wireline broadband in favor of broadband wireless WiMAX in much the same way many consumers are abandoning wireline voice in favor of wireless? In a recent interview, Don Marker, CEO of Sioux Valley Wireless told me, "The service is portable…something that no other existing service can offer. In the long run, it is very likely that our portable/mobile service will displace fixed services just as cellular service has done with fixed telephone service." All interesting and important questions, with huge implications for the entire telecom industry. Implications that are being revealed early on in places like Butte, Montana.
cWatch
Competitive Watch - we watch the industry so you don't have to. cWatch lists the latest new competitive telecom offerings, providing you first hand knowledge of who is doing what. Check back regularly to gain competitive intelligence, ideas, and analysis. Give us your opinion - what is the impact of these new service offerings?
- Comcast Brings Wideband to the Northwest
- Muni-Wireless Not Dead Yet
- Is Three Screen Convergence a Pipe Dream?
- Verizon Joins CDN Movement
- iPhone 3G Coming to WalMart
- Verizon Business Teams With Nortel for Managed Telepresence Service
- TiVo Adds Domino's Pizza to its Menu
- Verizon’s Turn for Smartphone Spotlight with BlackBerry Storm Launch
Channel
Webinars/Events
Upcoming Webinars
Packet Optical Networks – Enabling Your Future
Dec 16, 2008
Upcoming Events
NTCA Wireless Symposium
Jan 7-9, 2009 - Austin, TX
Featured Article
Should Telephone Service be Free?
12 Oct, 2008
Comcast announced a new promotion last week that offers 12 months of free basic cable service for new customers who also sign up for an additional service. Customers who don’t want an additional service can get Comcast’s basic service of about 20 -30 channels for $10/month. The promotion is tied to the digital TV transition of February 2009 and entices potential customers to avoid the transition “hassle” by getting “free” cable service. “The simple fact is that basic cable is the easiest path through the digital transition and now consumers can get it for free,” said Derek Harrar, General Manager and Senior Vice President, Video Services for Comcast in a company statement. This move is similar to strategies pursued by other video service providers, who are hoping to leverage the digital TV transition for new subscriber additions.
But is this strategy a leading indicator for the future? Should basic core services like basic cable and basic telephone service be offered for free, used as a “carrot” to entice customers to buy “more important” services like broadband? Maybe a very basic phone service, with no LD, access to landline 911, and maybe outgoing service only (to avoid telemarketers) should be a free component of a bundled offering. Such a wireline service may appeal to a customer who previously cut the cord for wireless only, but also needs broadband. There is a growing portion of the population who find the value of traditional wireline phone service elsewhere – either through wireless or broadband/IP services. But, if they could get the security of landline 911, and an extra dial tone in their home as a free value add for subscribing to broadband (or video from a telco’s perspective), maybe a telco’s bundled offering may look more attractive than a comparable cable offering. I realize this idea is not appealing to the hundreds of ILECs who are a part of the current access/settlement system (in fact, it couldn’t work in the context of today’s regulatory structure), but I wonder whether it’s inevitable. In this possible future scenario, the current settlement system adapts to broadband as the underlying service, as opposed to voice.
This scenario cuts both ways. From a cable company’s perspective, a growing portion of the population is turning to the Internet as a source for their video content, and no longer see value in paying for a broad package of video as a part of a traditional subscription pay-TV service. But, if they could receive basic TV (which includes local broadcast affiliates) as a free value add for buying broadband, maybe the cable bundle is more attractive. In a true IP/broadband world, very basic phone and video service is relatively easy to deliver, and has little impact on bandwidth and network performance. Maybe the digital transition is opening the door to a future where free basic services are a regular component of a bundled offering. Thoughts?

digg this story
google