<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://telecompetitor.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Homezone</title>
 <link>http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/40/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Akimbo is Dead</title>
 <link>http://telecompetitor.com/node/647</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;inline_left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.telecompetitor.com/images/akimbo_new.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image thumbnail&quot; height=&quot;69&quot; width=&quot;254&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.akimbo.com&quot; rel=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;Akimbo&lt;/a&gt;, an Internet video-on-demand service provider is no more. They’ve made it to &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/23/akimbo-jumps-into-deadpool-takes-56-million-with-it/&quot; rel=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;TechCrunch’s dreaded Deadpool&lt;/a&gt;. It’s somewhat of a puzzling development, since Akimbo raised $56 million just three months ago. Akimbo had shifted their business model to a “white label” provider of Internet VOD. &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://telecompetitor.com/node/407&quot; rel=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;CenturyTel recently launched an Internet VOD product&lt;/a&gt;, powered by Akimbo. &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.att.com/gen/general?pid=7910&amp;amp;DCMP=att_homezone&quot; rel=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;Akimbo was also featured in AT&amp;amp;T’s Homezone&lt;/a&gt; product. Akimbo’s demise gives Internet VOD somewhat of a blackeye. They originally started as a hardware provider, offering VOD set-top-boxes. They then shifted to a Internet only model, and their last iteration before death was a “white label” provider. Is there an Internet VOD model that works, because it looks like Akimbo tried them all?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/647#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/450">Akimbo</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/40">Homezone</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/323">Internet VOD</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/78">NetVideo</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/51">VOD</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 14:46:45 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">647 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>AT&amp;T Keen On Differentiation For U-Verse</title>
 <link>http://telecompetitor.com/node/112</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T is focusing on a series of new applications for its U-Verse service to build competitive advantage over entrenched Cablecos. Some of these applications are already known (and in use), including the U-bar, an interactive component that allows users to access weather, sports, or traffic information on their television screen; access to online photos; whole-home DVR; and Caller ID on the TV. AT&amp;amp;T is also using U-verse’s close cousin, &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.att.com/gen/general?pid=7910&quot;&gt; Homezone &lt;/a&gt; to test new applications. Remote control of Homezone features via a mobile phone is a great example. Launched for Homezone subscribers already, this service is soon to be available for U-verse subscribers. AT&amp;amp;T goes on record to say that it intends to use the full power of IP to differentiate itself from the competition, and ultimately win. It’s a high stakes gamble – one being played out by the entire telecom/cable industry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Read this excellent ScreenPlays &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;//www.screenplaysmag.com/tabid/96/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/492/Default.aspx&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; for more details.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/112#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/20">AT&amp;amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/111">Differentiation</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/40">Homezone</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/21">U-verse</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">112 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Remote DVR Programming - But Does Anyone Care?</title>
 <link>http://telecompetitor.com/node/42</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Both AT&amp;amp;T and Verizon will soon offer remote programming of a DVR from cell phones. Not to be outdone, their cable competitors will soon offer it as well, through their partnership with Sprint. AT&amp;amp;T is launching the service for their Homezone product, which pairs DSL with Dish TV satellite service and a DVR set top box. I’m sure their IPTV platform, U-verse is not too far behind.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The real question here may be, so what? Jupiter Research says only 10% of respondents from a recent survey expressed any interest in such a product. Or this might be one of those rare points in technology development history when a new service receives a great big yawn at launch, only to take the world by storm. Depending on who you ask, wireless SMS had a similar yawn. But look at it now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Read this Red Herring &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=21550&amp;amp;hed=AT%26amp%3BT%2C+Verizon+Program+DVRs”&quot;&gt; article&lt;/a&gt; for the details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/42#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/6">cNews</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/41">DVR</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/40">Homezone</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/22">Wireless</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:06:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">42 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
