<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cablevision Lights Up Wi-Fi Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.telecompetitor.com/cablevision-lights-up-wi-fi-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.telecompetitor.com/cablevision-lights-up-wi-fi-network/</link>
	<description>Providing insight, analysis, and commentary on the evolving telecom competitive landscape</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:58:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bernie Arnason</title>
		<link>http://www.telecompetitor.com/cablevision-lights-up-wi-fi-network/comment-page-1/#comment-2050</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Arnason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecompetitor.com/cablevision-lights-up-wi-fi-network/#comment-2050</guid>
		<description>I guess I agree with Jimmy to a certain extent, but I also think that since Cablevision is making the service free to broadband customers, the expectation is somewhat lowered. I&#039;m not saying customers will accept very poor quality, but I do think the range of what&#039;s acceptable to them will be wider, than if this was a paid service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I agree with Jimmy to a certain extent, but I also think that since Cablevision is making the service free to broadband customers, the expectation is somewhat lowered. I&#8217;m not saying customers will accept very poor quality, but I do think the range of what&#8217;s acceptable to them will be wider, than if this was a paid service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Talbon</title>
		<link>http://www.telecompetitor.com/cablevision-lights-up-wi-fi-network/comment-page-1/#comment-2046</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Talbon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecompetitor.com/cablevision-lights-up-wi-fi-network/#comment-2046</guid>
		<description>This is a smart move by them, provided the service has decent quality. If it performs like many public wi-fi networks do today, with poor quality, customers will quickly loose confidence in it and it will be a waste of money on their part. I hope their investing sufficient money into the network and not doing it on the cheap. They&#039;ll need to make a good first impression</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a smart move by them, provided the service has decent quality. If it performs like many public wi-fi networks do today, with poor quality, customers will quickly loose confidence in it and it will be a waste of money on their part. I hope their investing sufficient money into the network and not doing it on the cheap. They&#8217;ll need to make a good first impression</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
